TEXAS ENTITLEMENTAustin Development Watch ›
Firm profile

StoryBuilt

Land-use entitlement firm · 7 unique cases
23
Hearings
7
Cases
7
Concluded
85.7%
Approved of concluded
2016–2022
Active
0
Since 2024

The record, at case level

Of StoryBuilt’s 7 unique cases, 7 have concluded — reached a Planning Commission or ZAP decision — and 6 of those ended in approval at their final hearing: 85.7%.

Postponement is a clock, not a verdict: of the 4 concluded cases postponed at least once, 4 still ended in approval (100.0%).

Unique-case counts here are distinct case numbers. 9 of this record’s hearings also carry a case name but no number — but ~100% of those are the same matter as a numbered case already counted above, so the true unique-case count is a narrow range: 7 including the genuinely un-numbered matters. The case-level approval rate is computed on concluded numbered cases and is unaffected.

Counted once per case, not once per hearing: a case postponed several times before approval would otherwise read as several losses and one win.

Hearings by year

StoryBuilt: hearings by year2016: 4, 2017: 0, 2018: 3, 2019: 3, 2020: 3, 2021: 1, 2022: 9494’16’173’183’193’201’219’22

Outcome distribution

StoryBuilt: outcomesApproved: 8 (35%), Postponed: 13 (57%), Denied: 1 (4%), No decision: 1 (4%)35%57%Approved 8Postponed 13Denied 1No decision 1

Hearing timeline

Hearing dateOutcomeDistrictAgent
2022-10-25ApprovedD1Mike Melson
2022-10-25ApprovedD9Mike Melson
2022-10-25ApprovedD9Mike Melson
Pro · Full record
The complete 23-hearings record is a Pro feature. See what Pro unlocks →

Where they practice

D9 18D1 4D3 1

Hearing-level rates, for comparison

Postponement rate vs the fieldStoryBuilt: 59%, Field median: 44%StoryBuilt59%Field median44%
Approval rate 36.4% — below the field (46.1%) by 9.7 pts.

At the hearing level every appearance counts, so a case postponed N times adds N postponements and one decision. Hearing-level approval-of-decided is 36.4% (vs the field’s 46.1%) and postponement is 59.1% — both far from the case-level figure above, for exactly that reason. Two stages, two denominators: these are commission-stage outcomes (approve vs. postpone/deny at the Planning Commission or ZAP hearing), not the City Council vote. Once a Commission-recommended case reaches Council it is approved in the high-90s%, so a low commission-stage approval rate reflects strategic postponement, not defeat.

Recent cases

C14-2021-0082C14-2022-0081C14-2021-0185C14-2020-0062C8-2017-0092.0ANPA-2016-0013.01C8-2016-0130
Austin Development Watch · every figure traces to a certified record · hearing data through 2026-05-19 · Council outcomes through 2026-04-23 · gate-certified · generated 2026-07-29