TEXAS ENTITLEMENTAustin Development Watch ›
Firm profile

McLean & Howard

Land-use entitlement firm · 21 unique cases
40
Hearings
21
Cases
17
Concluded
100.0%
Approved of concluded
2016–2023
Active
0
Since 2024

The record, at case level

Of McLean & Howard’s 21 unique cases, 17 have concluded — reached a Planning Commission or ZAP decision — and 17 of those ended in approval at their final hearing: 100.0%.

Postponement is a clock, not a verdict: of the 8 concluded cases postponed at least once, 8 still ended in approval (100.0%). At least 1 of these cases are confirmed adopted as Council ordinances (Council records run only through 2026-04-23, so this is a floor, not a rate).

Counted once per case, not once per hearing: a case postponed several times before approval would otherwise read as several losses and one win.

Hearings by year

McLean & Howard: hearings by year2016: 4, 2017: 10, 2018: 16, 2019: 4, 2020: 1, 2021: 2, 2022: 0, 2023: 38164’1610’1716’184’191’202’21’223’23

Outcome distribution

McLean & Howard: outcomesApproved: 18 (45%), Postponed: 20 (50%), No decision: 2 (5%)45%50%Approved 18Postponed 20No decision 2

Hearing timeline

Hearing dateOutcomeDistrictAgent
2023-11-21Approved · Became law · Approved on all 3 readings · Council 2023-12-14D1Jeffrey Howard
2023-10-03Approved · Became law · Approved on all 3 readings · Council 2023-12-14D1Jeffrey Howard
2023-09-19Postponed · Became law · Approved on all 3 readings · Council 2023-12-14D1Jeffrey Howard
Pro · Full record
The complete 40-hearings record is a Pro feature. See what Pro unlocks →

Lead attorneys

Jeffrey Howard 40

Where they practice

D3 13D6 10D8 4D1 4

Hearing-level rates, for comparison

Postponement rate vs the fieldMcLean & Howard: 53%, Field median: 44%McLean & Howard53%Field median44%
Approval rate 47.4% — above the field (46.1%) by 1.3 pts.

At the hearing level every appearance counts, so a case postponed N times adds N postponements and one decision. Hearing-level approval-of-decided is 47.4% (vs the field’s 46.1%) and postponement is 52.6% — both far from the case-level figure above, for exactly that reason. Two stages, two denominators: these are commission-stage outcomes (approve vs. postpone/deny at the Planning Commission or ZAP hearing), not the City Council vote. Once a Commission-recommended case reaches Council it is approved in the high-90s%, so a low commission-stage approval rate reflects strategic postponement, not defeat.

Recent cases

C814-00-2063.10C14-2020-0130C14-2020-0001C814-96-0003.15C14-2018-0124C14-2019-0068C14-2018-0098C14-2018-0099
Austin Development Watch · every figure traces to a certified record · hearing data through 2026-05-19 · Council outcomes through 2026-04-23 · gate-certified · generated 2026-07-29