TEXAS ENTITLEMENTAustin Development Watch ›
Firm profile

Husch Blackwell

Land-use entitlement firm · 35 unique cases
131
Hearings
35
Cases
25
Concluded
92.0%
Approved of concluded
2016–2026
Active
25
Since 2024

The record, at case level

Of Husch Blackwell’s 35 unique cases, 25 have concluded — reached a Planning Commission or ZAP decision — and 23 of those ended in approval at their final hearing: 92.0%.

Postponement is a clock, not a verdict: of the 9 concluded cases postponed at least once, 9 still ended in approval (100.0%). At least 9 of these cases are confirmed adopted as Council ordinances (Council records run only through 2026-04-23, so this is a floor, not a rate).

Unique-case counts here are distinct case numbers. 38 of this record’s hearings also carry a case name but no number — but ~62% of those are the same matter as a numbered case already counted above, so the true unique-case count is a narrow range: 35 numbered, up to ~40 including the genuinely un-numbered matters. The case-level approval rate is computed on concluded numbered cases and is unaffected.

Counted once per case, not once per hearing: a case postponed several times before approval would otherwise read as several losses and one win.

Hearings by year

Husch Blackwell: hearings by year2016: 3, 2017: 18, 2018: 20, 2019: 7, 2020: 17, 2021: 15, 2022: 17, 2023: 9, 2024: 20, 2025: 3, 2026: 210203’1618’1720’187’1917’2015’2117’229’2320’243’252’26

Outcome distribution

Husch Blackwell: outcomesApproved: 29 (22%), Postponed: 94 (72%), Denied: 2 (2%), No decision: 6 (5%)22%72%Approved 29Postponed 94Denied 2No decision 6

Hearing timeline

Hearing dateOutcomeDistrictAgent
2026-03-10Approved · Became law · Approved as amended on all three readings · Council 2026-04-23D4Nikelle Meade
2026-03-10Approved · Became law · Approved on all three readings · Council 2026-04-23D4Nikelle Meade
2025-12-16Approved · Became law · Approved on all three readings · Council 2026-01-22D9Nikelle Meade
Pro · Full record
The complete 131-hearings record is a Pro feature. See what Pro unlocks →

Lead attorneys

Nikelle Meade 98Stacey L Milazzo 31Alecia Mosadomi 1Jerry L. Harris 1

Where they practice

D3 50D1 17D9 16D2 4

Hearing-level rates, for comparison

Postponement rate vs the fieldHusch Blackwell: 75%, Field median: 44%Husch Blackwell75%Field median44%
Approval rate 23.2% — below the field (46.1%) by 22.9 pts.

At the hearing level every appearance counts, so a case postponed N times adds N postponements and one decision. Hearing-level approval-of-decided is 23.2% (vs the field’s 46.1%) and postponement is 75.2% — both far from the case-level figure above, for exactly that reason. Two stages, two denominators: these are commission-stage outcomes (approve vs. postpone/deny at the Planning Commission or ZAP hearing), not the City Council vote. Once a Commission-recommended case reaches Council it is approved in the high-90s%, so a low commission-stage approval rate reflects strategic postponement, not defeat.

Recent cases

C14-2025-0099NPA-2025-0026.02C14-2025-0097C14-2024-0122C14-2024-0109C14-2024-0019.SHC14-2023-0021NPA-2023-0013.01
Austin Development Watch · every figure traces to a certified record · hearing data through 2026-05-19 · Council outcomes through 2026-04-23 · gate-certified · generated 2026-07-29