Of Jonathan Tomko’s 3 unique cases, 2 have concluded — reached a Planning Commission or ZAP decision — and 1 of those ended in approval at their final hearing: 50.0%.
Postponement is a clock, not a verdict: of the 1 concluded cases postponed at least once, 0 still ended in approval (0.0%). At least 2 of these cases are confirmed adopted as Council ordinances (Council records run only through 2026-04-23, so this is a floor, not a rate).
Counted once per case, not once per hearing: a case postponed several times before approval would otherwise read as several losses and one win.
| Hearing date | Outcome | District | Firm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-09-23 | Denied · Became law · Approved on all three readings · Council 2024-05-30 | D2 | City of Austin |
| 2025-08-26 | Postponed · Became law · Approved on all three readings · Council 2024-05-30 | D2 | City of Austin |
| 2025-07-22 | Postponed · Became law · Approved on all three readings · Council 2024-05-30 | D2 | City of Austin |
At the hearing level every appearance counts, so a case postponed N times adds N postponements and one decision. Hearing-level approval-of-decided is 12.5% (vs the field’s 46.1%) and postponement is 75.0% — both far from the case-level figure above, for exactly that reason. Two stages, two denominators: these are commission-stage outcomes (approve vs. postpone/deny at the Planning Commission or ZAP hearing), not the City Council vote. Once a Commission-recommended case reaches Council it is approved in the high-90s%, so a low commission-stage approval rate reflects strategic postponement, not defeat.