TEXAS ENTITLEMENTAustin Development Watch ›
Attorney profile

Ferris Clements

Land-use attorney of record · 8 unique cases
32
Hearings
8
Cases
5
Concluded
100.0%
Approved of concluded
2018–2026
Active
3
Since 2024

The record, at case level

Of Ferris Clements’s 8 unique cases, 5 have concluded — reached a Planning Commission or ZAP decision — and 5 of those ended in approval at their final hearing: 100.0%.

Postponement is a clock, not a verdict: of the 1 concluded cases postponed at least once, 1 still ended in approval (100.0%). At least 3 of these cases are confirmed adopted as Council ordinances (Council records run only through 2026-04-23, so this is a floor, not a rate).

Counted once per case, not once per hearing: a case postponed several times before approval would otherwise read as several losses and one win.

Hearings by year

Ferris Clements: hearings by year2018: 1, 2019: 0, 2020: 5, 2021: 0, 2022: 11, 2023: 12, 2024: 1, 2025: 1, 2026: 16121’18’195’20’2111’2212’231’241’251’26

Outcome distribution

Ferris Clements: outcomesApproved: 11 (34%), Postponed: 21 (66%)34%66%Approved 11Postponed 21

Hearing timeline

Hearing dateOutcomeDistrictFirm
2026-04-07ApprovedD7Armbrust & Brown
2025-07-22PostponedD3Armbrust & Brown
2024-08-27Approved · Became law · Approved on all three readings · Council 2024-09-26D10Armbrust & Brown
Pro · Full record
The complete 32-hearings record is a Pro feature. See what Pro unlocks →

Firm

Armbrust & Brown

Where they practice

D3 18D1 4D7 1D10 1

Hearing-level rates, for comparison

Postponement rate vs the fieldFerris Clements: 66%, Field median: 44%Ferris Clements66%Field median44%
Approval rate 34.4% — below the field (46.1%) by 11.7 pts.

At the hearing level every appearance counts, so a case postponed N times adds N postponements and one decision. Hearing-level approval-of-decided is 34.4% (vs the field’s 46.1%) and postponement is 65.6% — both far from the case-level figure above, for exactly that reason. Two stages, two denominators: these are commission-stage outcomes (approve vs. postpone/deny at the Planning Commission or ZAP hearing), not the City Council vote. Once a Commission-recommended case reaches Council it is approved in the high-90s%, so a low commission-stage approval rate reflects strategic postponement, not defeat.

Recent cases

C14-2026-0011C14-2024-0106C14-2023-0043NPA-2023-0020.01C14-2021-0121C14-2020-0086C14-2020-0017C14-2018-0078
Austin Development Watch · every figure traces to a certified record · hearing data through 2026-05-19 · Council outcomes through 2026-04-23 · gate-certified · generated 2026-07-29